Cain and Abel Genesis 4: Cain and Abel
Saturday, September 4, 2010
Antibiotics Work On Impetigo
Genesis 4: Cain and Abel Bustos Alba Marisa
Although it appears that the first sexual act of humanity was the cause of the condemnation expressed by Lord of the participants in the little game, and was extended to all humanity, the thing is not even half clear. Apparently the one hand the LORD commanded him to "be fruitful and multiply" the other says not to eat from the tree of "knowledge of good and evil" is precisely when they eat the fruit of the tree when they discover they are naked, they feel shame and made aprons to protect their privacy. It seems a clear symbolism to the Suppression of human sexuality that will be brand new, and a constant throughout the Bible, and Christianity today.
Or maybe what he himself writes in the Bible God is hiding something more serious? Since religion is it that this first sin was not sexual connotations, it was a sin of human pride, which was a desire to be like God, it was a challenge thrown by humans just right out of the hands of the operator wanting to catch up on.
course others understand and explain it otherwise. Apparently the tree in question is called the "knowledge of good and evil" funny name, where there is significant. Some people interpreted the symbolism of the tree as an attempt by of God to punish the knowledge that what actually born in the mind of Eve is the desire to know and understand the environment around you, start practicing a rudimentary science of knowledge, a reality that is involved. Little importance if it was Eva or Adam was the first step into the research and knowledge, the fact is they felt the desire to know, learning and research. What was shown in his eyes was unknown, bound by their need to know the human brain's innate curiosity of our species has no limits, we must ask questions, answer them as far as we can, we are obliged to investigate, learn, discover to advance knowledge, ultimately to demonstrate and look for evidence that what we believe is true, to create science. I care less if the essential characteristic of our species was placed by what some called the creator god, and others simply call it nature. The truth is that is there, we can not avoid it, if it were not for the innate curiosity still be in the same place as the first men who were on Earth. It is clear that after any correct answer a new question arises, that is and has been the path taken by mankind, an irreversible path that has led us to where we are now, we know a lot or know much, but if you know nothing we had not followed the path that forces us our brain.
From this point of view the fable of the "tree of knowledge of good and evil" takes a new perspective. The tree represent knowledge of science and its fruits, the snake represents the question, the question arose in the brains of those humans, and sin is only the desire to know, to learn, to see, to show what is , which can be seen, and what is sensed. Maybe that is precisely what the LORD wanted to suppress. Those who wrote the story and understand that knowledge and research, science, go away and closer to man's stupidity they wrote, that more knowledge go away more and more of the faith. They were aware that knowledge and faith are incompatible, were aware that sooner or later their lies would be discovered unprovable. And hence, the name of the tree of knowledge of "good and evil." Knowledge of good when that science is dominated by faith, when that science is subject to faith and works or advocates it. Science of evil when moving away from faith and religion, science of evil when he discovers that things are neutral in themselves, who do not have anything to do with God or faith. Science of evil when he discovers that behind it and is not God, nor was he expected.
Maybe that's what they really wanted to punish the god Yahweh indeed, curiosity and desire for knowledge of our species, a desire that our brain makes us human. Curious, which was our creator, who put in us a desire to be waived, it punishes the most egregious and continuing imaginable. Maybe it is that the Bible was not written by God, maybe it was written by men, although ignorant, and understand that sooner or later their lies would be discovered. Maybe in the Genesis was not repress both human sexuality and the desire for knowledge. Although after the repression of sexuality has become the workhorse of the Christian religion over the centuries.
Genesis, even in its broad outline follows the logical steps of how evolution really was. The Sun has a length of about 6,000 million years the Earth about 4,500 million years. The Sun, and of course the stars are much older than Earth, so Earth was never in darkness, when the Earth was formed, the Sun's light to millions of years that lit, and the star studded already sky million years before the Earth was formed. Genesis says the opposite, which was first created the earth in darkness and then the sun and stars. Another lie written by God, rather by ignorance of the men who invented God.
Although it appears that the first sexual act of humanity was the cause of the condemnation expressed by Lord of the participants in the little game, and was extended to all humanity, the thing is not even half clear. Apparently the one hand the LORD commanded him to "be fruitful and multiply" the other says not to eat from the tree of "knowledge of good and evil" is precisely when they eat the fruit of the tree when they discover they are naked, they feel shame and made aprons to protect their privacy. It seems a clear symbolism to the Suppression of human sexuality that will be brand new, and a constant throughout the Bible, and Christianity today.
Or maybe what he himself writes in the Bible God is hiding something more serious? Since religion is it that this first sin was not sexual connotations, it was a sin of human pride, which was a desire to be like God, it was a challenge thrown by humans just right out of the hands of the operator wanting to catch up on.
course others understand and explain it otherwise. Apparently the tree in question is called the "knowledge of good and evil" funny name, where there is significant. Some people interpreted the symbolism of the tree as an attempt by of God to punish the knowledge that what actually born in the mind of Eve is the desire to know and understand the environment around you, start practicing a rudimentary science of knowledge, a reality that is involved. Little importance if it was Eva or Adam was the first step into the research and knowledge, the fact is they felt the desire to know, learning and research. What was shown in his eyes was unknown, bound by their need to know the human brain's innate curiosity of our species has no limits, we must ask questions, answer them as far as we can, we are obliged to investigate, learn, discover to advance knowledge, ultimately to demonstrate and look for evidence that what we believe is true, to create science. I care less if the essential characteristic of our species was placed by what some called the creator god, and others simply call it nature. The truth is that is there, we can not avoid it, if it were not for the innate curiosity still be in the same place as the first men who were on Earth. It is clear that after any correct answer a new question arises, that is and has been the path taken by mankind, an irreversible path that has led us to where we are now, we know a lot or know much, but if you know nothing we had not followed the path that forces us our brain.
From this point of view the fable of the "tree of knowledge of good and evil" takes a new perspective. The tree represent knowledge of science and its fruits, the snake represents the question, the question arose in the brains of those humans, and sin is only the desire to know, to learn, to see, to show what is , which can be seen, and what is sensed. Maybe that is precisely what the LORD wanted to suppress. Those who wrote the story and understand that knowledge and research, science, go away and closer to man's stupidity they wrote, that more knowledge go away more and more of the faith. They were aware that knowledge and faith are incompatible, were aware that sooner or later their lies would be discovered unprovable. And hence, the name of the tree of knowledge of "good and evil." Knowledge of good when that science is dominated by faith, when that science is subject to faith and works or advocates it. Science of evil when moving away from faith and religion, science of evil when he discovers that things are neutral in themselves, who do not have anything to do with God or faith. Science of evil when he discovers that behind it and is not God, nor was he expected.
Maybe that's what they really wanted to punish the god Yahweh indeed, curiosity and desire for knowledge of our species, a desire that our brain makes us human. Curious, which was our creator, who put in us a desire to be waived, it punishes the most egregious and continuing imaginable. Maybe it is that the Bible was not written by God, maybe it was written by men, although ignorant, and understand that sooner or later their lies would be discovered. Maybe in the Genesis was not repress both human sexuality and the desire for knowledge. Although after the repression of sexuality has become the workhorse of the Christian religion over the centuries.
Genesis, even in its broad outline follows the logical steps of how evolution really was. The Sun has a length of about 6,000 million years the Earth about 4,500 million years. The Sun, and of course the stars are much older than Earth, so Earth was never in darkness, when the Earth was formed, the Sun's light to millions of years that lit, and the star studded already sky million years before the Earth was formed. Genesis says the opposite, which was first created the earth in darkness and then the sun and stars. Another lie written by God, rather by ignorance of the men who invented God.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment